He was a fellow of the British Academy and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature. Very good on the existentialists. The file will be sent to your email address. I started this book in order to read more philosophy; it was intended as a propaeduetic to further reading into Deleuze, Wittgenstein, etc. A really good summary. May his soul rest in peace. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of, Published Read it and find out why. Converted file can differ from the original. Start by marking “A Short History of Modern Philosophy (Routledge Classics)” as Want to Read: Error rating book. This book manages to summarize some of the most difficult material in philosophy without sacrificing too many important details and distinctions. For chapters of special interest re-reading two or three times for a refined understanding will be intellectually fruitful each time. Unfortunately, I consider it a waste of time, if, like me, you don't have some average (to high) knowledge of philosophy themes. Generally well explained but uneven in his treatment of those he chose to discuss. My full review is available. Wow, understanding modern philosophy is tough. It may take up to 1-5 minutes before you receive it. Instead there is much that requires more investigation on my part and this I think this book provided where to go. Written both for the seasoned student of philosophy as well as the general reader, the renowned writer Roger Scruton provides a survey of modern philosophy. Including material on recent debates. Scruton has his biases, but they are so well known and therefore apparent and mostly harmless. Be the first to ask a question about A Short History of Modern Philosophy. I found this much more useful to read than the Bertrand Russel book. I also very much appreciated his chapters on both Kant and Hegel, which I thought were lucidly written. I thought he gave an excellent summary of Spinoza’s philosophy however. Perhaps with Phenomenology is where his biases showed the most. He's fond of jargon, very judgmental, and I found it hard to weed out what was Scruton's take from what consensus positions might look for. Painting a portrait of modern philosophy that is vivid and animated, Scruton introduces us to some of the greatest philosophical problems invented in this period and pursued ever since. With these philosophers, the writing got a lot more interesting, and from there on it only got better. His chapters on political philosophy are well integrated with the rest of the book. The author's breadth of knowledge is incredible, and he uses his broader understanding of the History of Ideas to inform his portrayal of individual. This short history is, first of all, indeed very short and succinct but certainly not cursory. Not hearing these sides of the arguments in the past, it was nevertheless quite useful and informative to understand the arguments put forth on both sides. However, it is full of information and as long as you are paying enough attention and taking notes you can learn a lot. Painting a portrait of modern philosophy that is vivid and animated, Scruton introduces us to some of the greatest philosophical problems invented in this period and pursued ever since. I found this book quite unfriendly to the lay reader, who I have to assume is the targeted audience for a brief history. Welcome back. To see what your friends thought of this book, A superbly engaging summary of Western philosophy, starting from a brief recap of post-Hellenistic thought (Scruton comes to the defense of the medieval scholastics, showing how their work pre-empted many recent ideas) and then getting into depth from Descartes onwards, culminating in Wittgenstein and the modern conception of philosophy of language. But I still struggled to totally grasp what some of the major figures were trying to say and the significance of their thought. It may takes up to 1-5 minutes before you received it. Philosophy surveys tend either to ignore important nuances and therefore become just plain wrong, or pay attention to those details and therefore become impossible to read. Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books you've read. This sort of book needs clarity, not tentative views. Roger Scruton is a man of strong opinions who manages to understand other opinions while not necessarily sharing them. But I still struggled to totally grasp what some of the major figures were trying to say and the significance of their thought. Written both for the seasoned student of philosophy as well as the general reader, the renowned writer Roger Scruton provides a survey of modern philosophy. This was clearly a bad choice for someone who has no previous knowledge of philosophy. Including material on recent debates, A Short History of Modern Philosophy is already established as the classic introduction. I may have to. You can write a book review and share your experiences. comment. by Routledge, A Short History of Modern Philosophy (Routledge Classics). A very critical history. Including material on recent debates, A Short History of Modern Philosophy is already established as the classic introduction. The language the author uses is not accessible to the majority of the non-initiated audience. I wish Scruton's books had been available when I was reading philosophy as an undergraduate. Good on Hegel. But in such a case the analysis is superb and very rewarding. Painting a portrait of modern philosophy that is vivid and animated, Scruton introduces us to some of the greatest philosophical problems invented in this period and pursued ever since. That's not an easy task (to provide the core principles without judging them), but he doesn't do it all that well. The book title should perhaps read 'A short history of modern western philosophy' . If you haven't taken a course in philosophy, you owe it to yourself and to the world to give this book a read. Modern philosophy is philosophy developed in the modern era and associated with modernity.It is not a specific doctrine or school (and thus should not be confused with Modernism), although there are certain assumptions common to much of it, which helps to distinguish it from earlier philosophy.. Always engaging, Scruton takes us on a fascinating tour of the subject, from founding father Descartes to the most important and famous philosopher of the twentieth century, Ludwig Wittgenstein. Scruton here provides a “synthetic vision of the history of modern philosophy, from an analytical perspective”.. – For me, the book didn’t really take off until Scruton moved on to Leibniz, and then Locke. Then he turned around and did a nice, clear exposition on Sartre. November 11th 2001 The writing is hard to follow. He has been, as a sign of his valuable legacy, a controversial figure in contemporary philosophy. His "Short History of Modern Philosophy" is worth reading for two reasons: 1) it is a model of fine expository writing; and 2) it is an accessible overview of modern philosophy that will provide a foundation for further study of the central philosophers.

.

Spinach And Pear Smoothie, Mcgraw Hill Quiz Answers, Zero Melee Tier List, Marathon Pacer Rules, Gamble House Exterior, Mustard Sawfly Life Cycle, Salmon Scales Vs Skin, Rotisserie Basket Potatoes, Aldi Gouda Cheese, Greenwich, Ct Massage Spa, Chocolate Covered Fruit Near Me, Most Genetically Gifted Bodybuilder,